This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: RFA: MIPS TLS support

From: Richard Sandiford <rsandifo at redhat dot com>
To: Janis Johnson <janis187 at us dot ibm dot com>
Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2005 18:43:26 +0000
Subject: Re: RFA: MIPS TLS support
References: <20050309182711.GA19659@nevyn.them.org><87wtsgphu9.fsf@firetop.home> <20050310212916.GA21315@nevyn.them.org><wvnbr9qa2qs.fsf@talisman.cambridge.redhat.com><20050312011337.GA20948@nevyn.them.org> <87acp92q5w.fsf@firetop.home><20050314184002.GA5475@us.ibm.com>

Janis Johnson <janis187@us.ibm.com> writes:
> On Sat, Mar 12, 2005 at 09:02:03AM +0000, Richard Sandiford wrote:
>> I can't approve the testcase anyway, but how about using a
>> scan-assembler-not test for "x+"?  Something like (untested):
>
> Port maintainers can approve testcases.

Even target-independent ones?  (Genuine question ;)

Follow-Ups:
- Re: RFA: MIPS TLS support
  - From: Janis Johnson

References:
- RFA: MIPS TLS support
  - From: Daniel Jacobowitz
- Re: RFA: MIPS TLS support
  - From: Richard Sandiford
- Re: RFA: MIPS TLS support
  - From: Daniel Jacobowitz
- Re: RFA: MIPS TLS support
  - From: Richard Sandiford
- Re: RFA: MIPS TLS support
  - From: Daniel Jacobowitz
- Re: RFA: MIPS TLS support
  - From: Richard Sandiford
- Re: RFA: MIPS TLS support
  - From: Janis Johnson

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]