This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [C++ PATCH] Don't create an INTEGER_CST for aggregates (emptystructs)

On 12 Mar 2005 11:27:41 +0100, Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr@integrable-solutions.net> wrote:

> Second, the case of stack-based CPUs, e.g. x86-like.
> The caller does not need any push of such trailing empty class
> arguments on stack -- and the callee knows it has no business trying
> to pop such value.  Consequently adjustments need to be done for the 
> stack frame "depth". 

This assumes that we control both caller and callee, which violates the
idea of a standardized ABI.

Jason
Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]