This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: PATCH: testsuite/26_numerics/c99_classification_macros_c.cc

From: Ben Elliston <bje at au1 dot ibm dot com>
To: Paolo Carlini <pcarlini at suse dot de>
Cc: libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2005 11:06:53 +1100
Subject: Re: PATCH: testsuite/26_numerics/c99_classification_macros_c.cc
References: <422E646C.3070009@au.ibm.com> <422ECADD.2090200@suse.de> <422ECE5E.5060400@suse.de>

Sorry ;) My reply actually is about the other tweak that you are proposing,
to 12658_thread-1.cc. I don't have a strong opinion about this one.

Thanks. I committed the patch to 12658_thread-1.cc.

Any objections to the c99_classification_macros_c.cc case, or shall I commit that, too?

Ben

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Follow-Ups:
- Re: PATCH: testsuite/26_numerics/c99_classification_macros_c.cc
  - From: Benjamin Kosnik

References:
- PATCH: testsuite/26_numerics/c99_classification_macros_c.cc
  - From: Ben Elliston
- Re: PATCH: testsuite/26_numerics/c99_classification_macros_c.cc
  - From: Paolo Carlini
- Re: PATCH: testsuite/26_numerics/c99_classification_macros_c.cc
  - From: Paolo Carlini

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]