This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] Fix the -d8 options in gfortran

From: Paul Brook <paul at codesourcery dot com>
To: fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org
Cc: Steve Kargl <sgk at troutmask dot apl dot washington dot edu>,Steven Bosscher <stevenb at suse dot de>,gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2005 14:41:22 +0000
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix the -d8 options in gfortran
Organization: CodeSourcery
References: <20050309005944.GA36387@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <200503090206.23178.stevenb@suse.de> <20050309023513.GA53997@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>

On Wednesday 09 March 2005 02:35, Steve Kargl wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 09, 2005 at 02:06:23AM +0100, Steven Bosscher wrote:
> > On Wednesday 09 March 2005 01:59, Steve Kargl wrote:
> > > 2005-03-08  Steven G. Kargl  <kargls@comcast.net>
> > >
> > >  * gfortran.h (gfc_option_t): Remove unused variable d8.
> > >  * options.c (gfc_init_options): Remove uses of gfc_option.d8.
> > >     (gfc_handle_option): Ditto; use gfc_option.r8 and gfc_option.i8.
> >
> > Hmm...
> > Probably the right solution is to have a LANG_HOOKS_POST_OPTIONS that
> > sets gfc_option.[ir]8 if gfc_option.d8 is set.  But since we do not
> > have the negative of -[ir]8, I can live with this patch as-is.
>
> See attached.  Bubblestrapped and regtested.

Are you aware of this discussion?

http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2005-01/msg00137.html

Paul

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] Fix the -d8 options in gfortran
  - From: Steve Kargl

References:
- [PATCH] Fix the -d8 options in gfortran
  - From: Steve Kargl
- Re: [PATCH] Fix the -d8 options in gfortran
  - From: Steven Bosscher
- Re: [PATCH] Fix the -d8 options in gfortran
  - From: Steve Kargl

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]