This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [patch] fold-const.c: Reorganize fold - Part 8/n
- From: Roger Sayle <roger at eyesopen dot com>
- To: Kazu Hirata <kazu at cs dot umass dot edu>
- Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Sat, 5 Mar 2005 19:15:57 -0700 (MST)
- Subject: Re: [patch] fold-const.c: Reorganize fold - Part 8/n
On Sat, 5 Mar 2005, Kazu Hirata wrote:
> Attached is part 8 of my patch to reorganize fold.
> So we should use op0 and op1 wherever possible, which are defined to
> be TREE_OPERAND (t, 0) and TREE_OPERAND (t, 1), respectively, instead
> of writing TREE_OPERAND (t, 0) and TREE_OPERAND (t, 1) all over the
> function.
>
> Tested on i686-pc-linux-gnu. OK to apply?
Not even a ChangeLog entry for me to quote? :)
Ok for mainline, with an approprate ChangeLog.
Roger
--