This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [RHBZ#150115]
- From: Alexandre Oliva <aoliva at redhat dot com>
- To: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Cc: Ulrich Weigand <uweigand at de dot ibm dot com>
- Date: 04 Mar 2005 00:54:50 -0300
- Subject: Re: [RHBZ#150115]
- Organization: Red Hat Global Engineering Services Compiler Team
- References: <orwtsoumpv.fsf@livre.redhat.lsd.ic.unicamp.br>
On Mar 4, 2005, Alexandre Oliva <aoliva@redhat.com> wrote:
> I realize this patch is more of a kludge than a proper fix, but it
> gets the pattern to match and bootstraps successfully.
However, it failed to fix the problem. Doh! We still get a failure:
(insn 349 346 350 7 (parallel [
(set (reg:SI 5 %r5)
(reg/f:SI 0 %r0 [112]))
(use (const_int 0 [0x0]))
]) -1 (nil)
(nil))
and the failure is still there even if I change the mode of operand 1
to SImode. I suppose %r0 is not a valid address_operand. Oh well,
back to the drawing board.
Still, the issue of inappropriate uses of QImode deserves some looking
into.
--
Alexandre Oliva http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Red Hat Compiler Engineer aoliva@{redhat.com, gcc.gnu.org}
Free Software Evangelist oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org}