This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: Patch for PR target/19930 [pow(long double, int) on ia64]


> On Thu, Feb 24, 2005 at 04:14:16PM -0800, Steve Ellcey wrote:
> > 	* doc/tm.texi (LIBGCC2_LONG_DOUBLE_TYPE_SIZE): Document.
> > 	(LIBGCC2_HAS_DF_MODE): New.
> > 	(LIBGCC2_HAS_XF_MODE): New.
> > 	(LIBGCC2_HAS_TF_MODE): New.
> > 	* libgcc2.h (LIBGCC2_HAS_XF_MODE): New name for HAVE_XFMODE.
> > 	(LIBGCC2_HAS_TF_MODE): New name for HAVE_TFMODE.
> > 	* libgcc2.c (LIBGCC2_HAS_XF_MODE): New name for HAVE_XFMODE.
> > 	(LIBGCC2_HAS_TF_MODE): New name for HAVE_TFMODE.
> > 	(LIBGCC2_HAS_DF_MODE): New name for HAVE_DFMODE.
> > 	* config/ia64/t-ia64 (LIB1ASMFUNCS): Remove __compat
> > 	and add _fixtfdi, _fixunstfdi, _floatditf
> > 	* lib1funcs.asm: Remove L__compat. Add L_fixtfdi,
> > 	L_fixunstfdi, L_floatditf.
> > 	* config/ia64/hpux.h (LIBGCC2_HAS_XF_MODE): Define.
> > 	(LIBGCC2_HAS_TF_MODE): Define.
> 
> Ok.
> 
> 
> r~

I didn't get this checked in before Mark created the 4.0 branch but I am
going to assume it is OK to check it in on the 4.0 branch unless someone
tells me otherwise.  The PR involves the failure of a new test but that
failure is caused by code that is already checked in to 4.0 and there
will be a C++ problem involving pow() on ia64 if this isn't checked in
for 4.0.

I have already checked it in on the main line.

Steve Ellcey
sje@cup.hp.com


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]