This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] Avoid setting MEM_READONLY_P on decls that are not really read-only (PR regression/19813) (take 2)

From: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
To: Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>
Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2005 16:48:22 -0800
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Avoid setting MEM_READONLY_P on decls that are not really read-only (PR regression/19813) (take 2)
References: <20050216122557.GY15935@devserv.devel.redhat.com> <20050216202214.GA20913@redhat.com> <20050217101954.GF15935@devserv.devel.redhat.com> <20050217154940.GI15935@devserv.devel.redhat.com> <20050217180715.GB7490@redhat.com> <20050218000023.GR15935@devserv.devel.redhat.com>

On Thu, Feb 17, 2005 at 07:00:23PM -0500, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> 	PR c++/19813
> 	* emit-rtl.c (set_mem_attributes_minus_bitpos): Add assertion
> 	that ref to be marked MEM_READONLY_P doesn't have base that needs
> 	constructing.
> 
> 	* decl.c (start_decl_1): Clear TREE_READONLY flag if
> 	its type has TYPE_NEEDS_CONSTRUCTING.
> 	(complete_vars): Likewise.

Ok.


r~

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] Avoid setting MEM_READONLY_P on decls that are not reallyread-only (PR regression/19813) (take 2)
  - From: Mark Mitchell

References:
- [PATCH] Avoid setting MEM_READONLY_P on decls that are not really read-only (PR regression/19813)
  - From: Jakub Jelinek
- Re: [PATCH] Avoid setting MEM_READONLY_P on decls that are not really read-only (PR regression/19813)
  - From: Richard Henderson
- [PATCH] Avoid setting MEM_READONLY_P on decls that are not really read-only (PR regression/19813) (take 2)
  - From: Jakub Jelinek
- Re: [PATCH] Avoid setting MEM_READONLY_P on decls that are not really read-only (PR regression/19813) (take 2)
  - From: Jakub Jelinek
- Re: [PATCH] Avoid setting MEM_READONLY_P on decls that are not really read-only (PR regression/19813) (take 2)
  - From: Richard Henderson
- Re: [PATCH] Avoid setting MEM_READONLY_P on decls that are not really read-only (PR regression/19813) (take 2)
  - From: Jakub Jelinek

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]