This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] Split simplify_unary_operation and simplify_binary_operation

From: Paolo Bonzini <paolo dot bonzini at lu dot unisi dot ch>
To: Roger Sayle <roger at eyesopen dot com>
Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2005 17:11:10 +0100
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Split simplify_unary_operation and simplify_binary_operation
References: <4210C725.6050503@lu.unisi.ch> <Pine.LNX.4.44.0502141913480.25477-100000@www.eyesopen.com>

Hi Mark,

I was wondering whether you (or other maintainers) could comment on
the policies for mainline patches that perform large text rearrangements
but with no functional changes, such as Paolo's patch to split the
large functions simplify_binary_operation and simplify_unary_operation
and potentially Kazu's patches for splitting fold.

While knowing an answer is interesting on its own, I withdraw the patch as it miscompiles the C++ front-end on i686-pc-linux-gnu.

Paolo

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] Split simplify_unary_operation and simplify_binary_operation
  - From: Paolo Bonzini

References:
- Re: [PATCH] Split simplify_unary_operation and simplify_binary_operation
  - From: Paolo Bonzini
- Re: [PATCH] Split simplify_unary_operation and simplify_binary_operation
  - From: Roger Sayle

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]