This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [RFC] PowerPC 128 bit long double compatibility (PR target/19019)

On Tue, Feb 15, 2005 at 01:42:29AM -0800, Richard Henderson wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 15, 2005 at 08:09:02PM +1030, Alan Modra wrote:
> > -GCC_3.4 {
> > +GCC_3.4.4 {
> 
> Don't you still need the GCC_3.4 symbol and the _xlc names
> in the version map, even with the symver?

No, I don't think so.  At least, the linker doesn't need the syms to be
mentioned in a version script as well as .symver.  Perhaps there's
something I'm missing about the gcc build process..

libgcc_s.so and libgcc.a look good to me.

-- 
Alan Modra
IBM OzLabs - Linux Technology Centre
Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]