This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: PR19578: noreturn vs. function pointer propagation part 2
Richard Sandiford wrote:
Hmm, I guess but I'd like to see some timings first. What's the compile
time impact on function-pointer intensive code like libjava/interpret.cc?
* tree-cfg.c (is_ctrl_altering_stmt): Return true for indirect calls.
Did you run into trouble with the other approach of marking blocks that
had function pointers replaced propagated?