This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: PR19578: noreturn vs. function pointer propagation part 2


Richard Sandiford wrote:

	PR tree-optimization/19578
	* tree-cfg.c (is_ctrl_altering_stmt): Return true for indirect calls.

Hmm, I guess but I'd like to see some timings first. What's the compile time impact on function-pointer intensive code like libjava/interpret.cc?

Did you run into trouble with the other approach of marking blocks that had function pointers replaced propagated?


Diego.



Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]