This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: PR tree-opt/19484: noreturn vs. function pointer propagation

From: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
To: Richard Sandiford <rsandifo at redhat dot com>
Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2005 12:57:56 -0800
Subject: Re: PR tree-opt/19484: noreturn vs. function pointer propagation
References: <87wtu5dbdb.fsf@redhat.com> <20050123022254.GA13328@redhat.com> <87y8ejanoj.fsf@redhat.com>

On Sun, Jan 23, 2005 at 08:35:40PM +0000, Richard Sandiford wrote:
> Isn't that already done by tree_purge_dead_eh_edges?  E.g. DOM has:

Ah right.


r~

References:
- PR tree-opt/19484: noreturn vs. function pointer propagation
  - From: Richard Sandiford
- Re: PR tree-opt/19484: noreturn vs. function pointer propagation
  - From: Richard Henderson
- Re: PR tree-opt/19484: noreturn vs. function pointer propagation
  - From: Richard Sandiford

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]