This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [PATCH] Fix PR libstdc++/19510: Uninitialized variable in some iterators
Mark Mitchell <email@example.com> writes:
| Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
| > In the typical case where a singular iterator is created, it is
| > inlined and if the compiler cannot figure out that those inlined
| > initialization can be efficiently turned into something else, then
| > it is a compiler bug.
| I'm not confident that the compiler will always be able to figure this out.
I based my analysis from application programmer and library users
point of view.
Do you have any real world example to submit for scrunity?
| In any case, why should we take that chance?
| If someone runs a benchmark of G++ & V3 vis a vis some other system,
| and the benchmark shows that we're slower, we lose. It doesn't matter
| whether that's because of the compiler or the library. No, I'm not
| arguing that we should hand code the entire library in some special
| style that's particularly amenable to G++. I am arguing, however,
| that inserting code to do something that is on most systems at best
| pointless, and quite possibly harmful, is a mistake.
What is a possibly harmful, a mistake is this meaningless discussion
with you about benchmarks on singular iterator values. I understand
you value speed over correctness. We just have to agree to disagree.