This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: PING: PATCH: PR objc/18408 (but really a gimplifier fix)



On 20 Jan 2005, at 17.01, Lars Sonchocky-Helldorf wrote:



Am Freitag, 21.01.05 um 01:30 Uhr schrieb Andrew Pinski:



On Jan 20, 2005, at 7:15 PM, Ziemowit Laski wrote:



On 20 Jan 2005, at 16.15, Andrew Pinski wrote:



On Jan 20, 2005, at 6:39 PM, Lars Sonchocky-Helldorf wrote:


http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2004-11/msg00925.html

This patch for http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18408 is unreviewed for more than two month now. Is there really nobody who can approve it? Come on somebody with approval privileges *must* be gimple literate.

It was reviewed and got rejected.

When? Where?

Lars should have remembered because he pinged it too.


http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2004-12/msg00889.html

Oh, my bad.

Ok, I seem to recall this also. :-( RTH is right in that the ObjC type system representation is inconsistent, but that is really orthogonal to whether the patch I proposed is safe or not. A rewrite of the type representation (to bring it closer in line with C++/Java) is planned, but in the gcc-4.1 time frame at the earliest.


--Zem


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]