This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [PATCH] PR target/18916; Function arg passing mem align fixes.
On Thu, Jan 20, 2005 at 09:49:19PM +0000, Richard Sandiford wrote:
> Is it OK to go back to using "0" as the alignment, or would you prefer
> something like MIN (TYPE_ALIGN (data->passed_type), BITS_PER_WORD) intead?
> I suppose another alternative would be to tweak move_block_from_reg
> to use unaligned stores, but that would be a code-quality regression.
I'm just discussing this with Steven Ellecy. I think we want both
move_block_from_reg fixed and some tweak to the alignment here. I'd
suggested something based off LOCAL_ALIGNMENT, but using a MAX there
might be just as good.