This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Possible patch for tree-optimization/13000
On Wed, Jan 19, 2005 at 03:08:51PM -0800, Richard Henderson wrote:
> (At minimum, the
> behaviour of SWITCH_EXPR isn't the same until gimplification is
> complete. Perhaps it's a mistake to give the two behaviours the
> same name...)
Not quite true. We could check SWITCH_LABELS vs SWITCH_BODY in
block_may_fallthru. Only one of the two should be non-null, and
which is set determines its behaviour.