This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [RFC] Fix PR19401: always completely peel loops
- From: kenner at vlsi1 dot ultra dot nyu dot edu (Richard Kenner)
- To: dberlin at dberlin dot org
- Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Thu, 13 Jan 05 21:57:08 EST
- Subject: Re: [RFC] Fix PR19401: always completely peel loops
To take your example, btw, Inlining *is* something that is a language
Depending on what you mean, I'm not sure I agree. It's certainly true that
because some languages generate lots of tiny functions internally that
inlining might be a more *important* optimization in some languages (e.g.,
C++ and Ada) than others (e.g., C), but given a set of functions represented
in some IL, I don't think the question of whether or how to inline them
depends on what language each was originally written in.