This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [tree-profiling-branch PATCH IPCP extensions + Function cloning
> On Wednesday 12 January 2005 11:24, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> > Actually I think the code is improperly factored here.
> Probably init_cfg needs to be a cfg_hook...?
Perhaps. Since seems bit weird to expect cfg_hook pointer to be
initialized properly when there is no CFG, other possibility would be
init_tree_cfg/init_rtl_cfg that will both set the hooks and care
annotations... Both sounds fine to me.
Razya, I guess you can either implement this in your patch or keep this
things as they are right now and I will cleanup it next (it is easier to
kill dead static function rather then notice that global function is no
longer used in other modules)