This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: PR19038 causes regression of 3.9% in SPEC int
- From: Steven Bosscher <stevenb at suse dot de>
- To: law at redhat dot com
- Cc: Roger Sayle <roger at eyesopen dot com>, Mostafa Hagog <MUSTAFA at il dot ibm dot com>, pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Wed, 29 Dec 2004 20:40:41 +0100
- Subject: Re: PR19038 causes regression of 3.9% in SPEC int
- Organization: SUSE Labs
- References: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0412240256330.24989-100000@www.eyesopen.com> <200412241426.29440.stevenb@suse.de> <1104347968.4619.7.camel@localhost.localdomain>
On Wednesday 29 December 2004 20:19, Jeffrey A Law wrote:
> Well, this ought to fix the poor placement of the copy instruction.
Cool. One question, don't you need a call to mark_dfs_back_edges()
somewhere?
Gr.
Steven