This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: RFA/RFC: Using weak symbols to work around missing newlib math functions in gcc.dg tests

From: Andrew Pinski <pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu>
To: Roger Sayle <roger at eyesopen dot com>
Cc: rearnshaw at cambridge dot arm dot com, <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>, Nick Clifton <nickc at redhat dot com>
Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2004 09:54:00 -0500
Subject: Re: RFA/RFC: Using weak symbols to work around missing newlib math functions in gcc.dg tests
References: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0412030628490.24603-100000@www.eyesopen.com>

On Dec 3, 2004, at 8:30 AM, Roger Sayle wrote:

On Fri, 3 Dec 2004, Nick Clifton wrote:
2004-12-03 Nick Clifton <nickc@redhat.com>
	* gcc.dg/builtins-config.h: Use <sys/types.h> instead of
	<limits.h> because the latter comes from gcc's include/ directory
	and not the newlib/libc/include directory.
This is Ok for mainline.

Note this is PR 18350, PR 18341, and PR 18342

Thanks,
Andrew Pinski

Follow-Ups:
- Re: RFA/RFC: Using weak symbols to work around missing newlib mathfunctions in gcc.dg tests
  - From: Nick Clifton

References:
- Re: RFA/RFC: Using weak symbols to work around missing newlib mathfunctions in gcc.dg tests
  - From: Roger Sayle

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]