This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [web,cfo] project page for cfo-branch
- From: Gerald Pfeifer <gerald at pfeifer dot com>
- To: Gábor Lóki <loki at inf dot u-szeged dot hu>
- Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Fri, 26 Nov 2004 22:47:44 +0100 (CET)
- Subject: Re: [web,cfo] project page for cfo-branch
- References: <41A709C4.email@example.com> <41A70EC1.firstname.lastname@example.org>
On Fri, 26 Nov 2004, [ISO-8859-2] Gábor Lóki wrote:
> Is it OK to commit?
Please consider the following remarks and apply the resulting patch
after sending it to gcc-patches (without waiting for further approval).
+ motion and merging algorithms). Messages should be marked with <code>
+ [cfo]</code> in the subject line. The usual contribution and testing
+ rules apply.</dd>
I believe this line break will create an "artificial" blank before
[cfo]; it might be better to move <code> to the next line, directly
+++ wwwdocs/htdocs/projects/cfo.html 2004-11-23 09:12:28.000000000 +0100
This, and Documentation should be <h2>, like the News section. In both
cases I would prefer to omit the <hr />.
+<p>The goal of this project is to add a new extension for improving the code
+size optimization of GCC with code factoring methods (code motion and merging
+algorithms). The implementation currently resides in the cfo-branch branch.</p>
"on the branch"?
+<p>The project includes two different code factoring algorithms which are the
How about "...includes the following two code factoring..."?
+<li>Local code factoring: This is code motion technique which tries to merge two
"a code motion technique", and these lines are a bit long.
+<p>Both algorithms have an oportunity of working on two different levels
+(Tree, RTL). Both have their own advatages and disadvatages.
+<p>For more information about code factoring see the
+GCC Summit Proceedings</a>.</p>
Include the year (2004) as well?