This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [doc] empty loops
"Giovanni Bajo" <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
| Nathan Sidwell <email@example.com> wrote:
| >>> It's certainly ok to document that we intend to remove such loops,
| >>> even if we don't actually do it now.
| >> I confused myself with the example. I meant it to point out that
| >> even non-empty C loops can be optimized to empty ones. How about
| >> this adjusted wording that leaves it open to when such loops
| >> actually get deleted.
| Can we document this into gcc-4.0/changes.html as a heads-up for future
That sounds a sensible action. I do not want another cast-as-lvalue