This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [doc] empty loops


"Giovanni Bajo" <giovannibajo@libero.it> writes:

| Nathan Sidwell <nathan@codesourcery.com> wrote:
| 
| >>> It's certainly ok to document that we intend to remove such loops,
| >>> even if we don't actually do it now.
| >>
| >> I confused myself with the example.  I meant it to point out that
| >> even non-empty C loops can be optimized to empty ones.  How about
| >> this adjusted wording that leaves it open to when such loops
| >> actually get deleted.
| 
| Can we document this into gcc-4.0/changes.html as a heads-up for future
| versions?

That sounds a sensible action.  I do not want another cast-as-lvalue
dissection. 

-- Gaby


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]