This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [v3, v7-branch] Implement resolution of DR 434
- From: Phil Edwards <phil at codesourcery dot com>
- To: Benjamin Kosnik <bkoz at redhat dot com>
- Cc: Paolo Carlini <pcarlini at suse dot de>, "'gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org'" <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>, libstdc++ <libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2004 14:00:47 -0500
- Subject: Re: [v3, v7-branch] Implement resolution of DR 434
- References: <419B30D8.firstname.lastname@example.org> <email@example.com>
- Reply-to: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org
On Wed, Nov 17, 2004 at 10:59:30AM -0600, Benjamin Kosnik wrote:
> >seems rather straightforward. Tested x86-linux, committing
> >to libstdcxx_so_7-branch.
> Seems completely straightforward. So much in fact that I'm wondering why
> you don't put this on mainline. To me, it seems safe even for 3.4. branch....
It looks safe enough for stage 3 mainline to me, too. Like the DR says,
other implementations already do this, and I can't imagine existing code
that could break.
Is 3.4 open for checkins again? I've been completely out of touch.
You're proposing to build a box with a light on top of it. The light is
supposed to go off when you carry the box into a room that has a Unicorn
in it. How do you show that it works?
- Dr. Gene "spaf" Spafford, at Dr. Wenliang Du's qualifing exam