This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [gnu] Darwin libgcc/assert fix, uncontroversial piece (need sh-linux testing)


Kaz Kojima <kkojima@rr.iij4u.or.jp> writes:

> Zack Weinberg <zack@codesourcery.com> wrote:
>> 3) Delete config/sh/libgcc-std.ver.  Create config/sh/libgcc-excl.ver,
>>    and change config/sh/t-linux to use it.  (Perhaps the exclusions
>>    should be in config/sh/libgcc-glibc.ver instead of creating a new
>>    file.  Thoughts?)
> [snip]
>> This has been bootstrapped, with no regressions, on i686-linux and
>> powerpc-darwin.  I do not have the ability to test sh-linux; I would
>> appreciate help on that score.  I will not check this patch in without
>> hearing from SH maintainers first.
>
> I'm only an sh-linux maintainer but I'd like to reply because the file
> config/sh/libgcc-std.ver is used only with linux ports.
> I prefer libgcc-excl.ver rather than to push it into libgcc-glibc.ver
> because it's unrelated to glibc. 

Fine with me.  I speculated that it might be appropriate to combine
the two because sh/t-linux is the only fragment that uses either, but
that is arguably an accident of no one else having done SH shared
libraries yet.

> I've tested your patch on x86 cross sh4-unknown-linux-gnu and found
> no problems.  I've also started a native bootstrap on
> sh4-unknown-linux-gnu which will take a couple of hours, though I
> believe that the tests on the cross build are enough for this case.

Thank you.  I will check the patch in later tonight.

zw


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]