This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [PATCH] add split condition to *fix_trunchi_1
Richard Henderson <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> On Tue, Nov 09, 2004 at 11:31:53PM -0800, Zack Weinberg wrote:
>> > - ""
>> > + "&& 1"
>> Aren't these functionally identical? If not, why not?
> The first form specifies an unconditional split, and the second
> effectively copies the condition from the insn.
Notational concerns aside, I'm not sure how they can be functionally
different. If the insn is never generated, I don't see how it matters
whether the splitter is unconditional.