This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Java: [BC] Implement type assertion table
>>>>> "Bryce" == Bryce McKinlay <email@example.com> writes:
Bryce> Doing the work to lay out indirect-dispatch tables and such is also
Bryce> "linking", but I agree that having the distinction between generic
Bryce> class layout and that which is specific to the BC-ABI may make
Bryce> sense. However, there is already native-code/BC-ABI-specific
Bryce> functions are already in _Jv_Linker - link_symbol_table(),
Bryce> link_exception_table(), etc. We could separate these out into some
Bryce> other class/file, specific to the BC-ABI?
Yeah, good point. Go ahead and put your patch in as is.
Maybe we need another refactoring in here, but there's no need to
hold up this patch waiting for it.