This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [BC] Patch: RFA: itable fix

From: Tom Tromey <tromey at redhat dot com>
To: Andrew Haley <aph at redhat dot com>
Cc: Gcc Patch List <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>, Java Patch List <java-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: 25 Oct 2004 13:16:13 -0600
Subject: Re: [BC] Patch: RFA: itable fix
References: <m3r7nrsh63.fsf@localhost.localdomain><16760.53166.620783.438047@cuddles.cambridge.redhat.com>
Reply-to: tromey at redhat dot com

>>>>> "Andrew" == Andrew Haley <aph@redhat.com> writes:

Tom> Are we relying on padding to ensure that these are compatible?
Tom> Why not just declare things the same in both places?  That is both
Tom> more understandable and safer.

Andrew> Yes, much.

I filed a PR for this.  I also checked in my fix.  Thanks for looking
at this.

Tom

References:
- [BC] Patch: RFA: itable fix
  - From: Tom Tromey
- [BC] Patch: RFA: itable fix
  - From: Andrew Haley

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]