This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: gcc/libobjc aclocal.m4 configure.ac configure ...
- From: Andrew Pinski <pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu>
- To: Mike Stump <mrs at apple dot com>
- Cc: "gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org Patches" <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2004 18:41:16 -0400
- Subject: Re: gcc/libobjc aclocal.m4 configure.ac configure ...
- References: <firstname.lastname@example.org> <140D16A4-221D-11D9-B4B8-000A95D692F4@physics.uc.edu> <05A0E9E8-221E-11D9-8A63-000393941EE6@apple.com>
On Oct 19, 2004, at 6:27 PM, Mike Stump wrote:
On Oct 19, 2004, at 3:20 PM, Andrew Pinski wrote:
On Oct 19, 2004, at 6:12 PM, email@example.com wrote:
Module name: gcc
Could you post this patch to gcc-patches@, I might approve it to the
mainline if you give a good argument for it. So you don't have to
carry along this local patch.
Ok, what do people think about adding maintainer mode support to
libobjc, as is done for all other parts of the compiler?
Do we want to do it this way (ick), or switch to using automake for
libobjc? I think prefer the later, but don't want to do that work.
Really we only need to switch to automake for aclocal which is what
I am going to apply. I found out by moving aclocal.m4 to acinclude.m4
and running aclocal and then running autoconf. I post the patch/apply
the patch after a little testing.