This is the mail archive of the mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: Patch to rs6000/eabispe.h and rs6000/linuxspe.h to disallow -m64

On Thu, Oct 14, 2004 at 04:01:53PM -0700, Geoff Keating wrote:
> On 14/10/2004, at 3:15 PM, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> >On Thu, Oct 14, 2004 at 02:25:48PM -0700, Geoff Keating wrote:
> >>This is OK.  The alternative would be to define a special movsi 
> >>pattern
> >>for !TARGET_FPRS (and then a dozen more for each possible 
> >>register/flag
> >>combination), which doesn't sound like a winning approach to .md file
> >>design.
> >
> >David pointed out that this applies to TARGET_SOFT_FLOAT also
> >(personally, I'd have TARGET_SOFT_FLOAT imply !TARGET_FPRS...).
> I would too...

Me three.

Daniel, the tests finished.  Things look horrendous, but better.

For example:

FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/930623-1.c (test for excess errors)
Excess errors:
/source/uber/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/compile/930623-1.c:7: error: insn does
not satisfy its constraints:
(insn 104 146 58 (set (reg:DI 33 1)
        (mem:DI (plus:SI (reg/f:SI 31 31)
                (const_int 48 [0x30])) [0 S8 A8])) 338 {*movdi_internal32} (nil)    (nil))

But this is much better than the current status.  Feel free to commit
if you haven't already done so.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]