This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: Unreviewed patch


On Tue, 12 Oct 2004, Ulrich Weigand wrote:
> [PATCH] Fix too-large constants pushed as reload
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2004-09/msg02977.html

Would it be OK for ask you to bootstrap and regression test this patch
on at least one other platform?  May be x86 and/or powerpc?  As you'll
appreciate accepting patches to reload is a risky business, even before
stage3.  With the exception of setting goal_alternative_win, this hunk
looks like a obvious extension of the non-PLUS case, but I'm not
confident enough to believe it's totally safe without some additional
testing.

Many thanks in advance,
[Don't let this request stop you commiting your patch, if another
maintainer is happy to approve it without any additional testing].

Roger
--


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]