This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [patch] tree-cfg.c: Speed up cleanup_tree_cfg().


dnovillo@redhat.com (Diego Novillo)  wrote on 01.10.04 in <1096680123.8261.3.camel@localhost.localdomain>:

> On Fri, 2004-10-01 at 20:52, Giovanni Bajo wrote:
> > Andrew MacLeod wrote:
> >
> > > I'm willing to bet there are places where we slow down a release
> > > compiler because we are performing a lot of assertions  we thought we
> > > were only doing with ENABLE_CHECKING. I certainly have written some.
> > > bah.
> >
> > In the patches Nathan and I have been doing to convert GCC to gcc_assert,
> > we always checked each and every abort line manually and used our own
> > judgement about what is heavy and what is not. Of course, I can do (and
> > probably have done) mistakes, but stay sure it was not a mechanical
> > change.
> >
> My concern is, actually, new code.  I was also under the impression that
> gcc_assert was a nop in released compilers.  We should have a bigger

I find this rather astonishing, as I certainly remember it having been  
spelled out in detail repeatedly.

MfG Kai


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]