This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: Your 'Class <Protocol>' Work



On 30 Sep 2004, at 23.39, Kai Henningsen wrote:


zlaski@apple.com (Ziemowit Laski) wrote on 30.09.04 in <8AD84E9F-1344-11D9-A719-000393673036@apple.com>:

is not implemented by protocol(s). (This raises a separate, tangential
issue:
protocols don't really implement things -- perhaps "not listed in
protocol(s)"
would be better?)

Isn't that what C generally calls "declared"? I think where generic C vocabulary is sufficient, Objective C shouldn't use new terms.

I agree that "declared" makes sense here.


--Zem


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]