Re: [PATCH] Optimize stdarg functions with void * or char * va_list

[Richard Guenther <richard dot guenther at gmail dot com>]

On Thu, 30 Sep 2004 10:02:29 -0700, Richard Henderson <rth@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 29, 2004 at 04:43:34PM -0400, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> >       * tree-stdarg.c (struct stdarg_info): Add va_list_escape_vars
> >       and va_list_escapes fields.
> >       (va_list_counter_bump): Handle WITH_SIZE_EXPR.
> >       Handle COUNTER being a VAR_DECL.
> >       (va_list_ptr_read, va_list_ptr_write, check_va_list_escapes,
> >       check_all_va_list_escapes): New functions.
> >       (execute_optimize_stdarg): Handle void * or char * va_list.
> >
> >       * gcc.dg/tree-ssa/stdarg-2.c: Compile on all architectures,
> >       add { target x86_64-*-* powerpc-*-* } to current dg-final
> >       lines.  Add dg-final lines for void * or char * va_list
> >       architectures.
> >       * gcc.dg/tree-ssa/stdarg-3.c: Likewise.
> >       * gcc.dg/tree-ssa/stdarg-4.c: Likewise.
> 
> Ok.

I'm confused.  Aren't we in stage3?  If it is a regression fix, what's
its PR?  I think there is too much questionable (not clearly stage3)
material going in right now.

Richard.