This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [gfortran] Change libgfortran license to GPL+exception


Jeffrey A Law wrote:
> Changing the license is something that the FSF (via RMS) would have
> to decide.  It's not something in the realm of what developers decide.

I did take the route Mike Stump suggested on September 1st:
> The purpose of assigning copyright to the FSF is to allow the FSF to 
> correct goofs like this.  If that was done for Fortran, and it should 
> have been, then the FSF can decide to change it.  The right global 
> rights person that would review this _knows_ if they can without asking 
> the FSF for permission, and _will_ ask them otherwise.
> 
> So, short story long, it is ok to do up the patch and submit it, but it 
> _must_ be reviewed by the right person.  Law in the past has had some 
> state on this topic, and might be the right person, the SC can ok it as 
> well.  Not that they can, but rather, they know if they can, and won't 
> if they can't.
> 
> All the libfortran maintainers are supposed to know all of this...  :-) 
>   so it isn't meant to controversial.  In addition, the library 
> reviewers really should catch this sort of thing _before_ oking work, 
> not after.  :-(  It is always more painful after.

That didn't lead anyhere. What would you suggest as the right way of solving
this problem?

- Tobi


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]