This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [patch] extend.texi MIPS PS/3D Support


> It would be good idea to update vectorization tests
> for other vector architectures.

Absolutely. When I first introduced the tests I enabled them only for
targets I have access to and could verify that they pass, but people are
welcome to enable the tests for other relevant architectures (x86_64-*-*
for example was added thanks to Andi Kleen's initiative).

dorit



                                                                                                                                   
                      Devang Patel                                                                                                 
                      <dpatel@apple.com        To:       Giovanni Bajo <giovannibajo@libero.it>                                    
                      >                        cc:       "Fu, Chao-Ying" <fu@mips.com>, Gerald Pfeifer <gerald@pfeifer.com>, Dorit 
                                                Naishlos/Haifa/IBM@IBMIL, nigel@mercury.mips.com, radhika@mercury.mips.com,        
                      22/09/2004 03:48          uhler@mercury.mips.com, Jim Wilson <wilson@specifixinc.com>,                       
                                                gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org                                                            
                                               Subject:  Re: [patch] extend.texi MIPS PS/3D Support                                
                                                                                                                                   





On Sep 21, 2004, at 6:33 PM, Giovanni Bajo wrote:

> Does MIPS PS/3D work also with the autovectorizer?

Autovectorizer checks if required vector instruction is supported by
target or not. I am not familiar with MIPS PS/3D but if vector insns
match then why not? It would be good idea to update vectorization tests
for other vector architectures. Right now each tests contain following
powerpc and x68 specific options setting.

/* { dg-options "-O2 -ftree-vectorize -fdump-tree-vect-stats -maltivec"
{ target powerpc*-*-* } } */
/* { dg-options "-O2 -ftree-vectorize -fdump-tree-vect-stats -msse2" {
target i?86-*-* x86_64-*-* } } */


-
Devang




Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]