This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[arm] XFAIL g++.old-deja/g++.pt/static11.C
- From: Paul Brook <paul at codesourcery dot com>
- To: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Sat, 18 Sep 2004 23:57:56 +0100
- Subject: [arm] XFAIL g++.old-deja/g++.pt/static11.C
- Organization: CodeSourcery
g++.old-deja/g++.pt/static11.C fails on simulator targets requiring a wrapper
for the exit code. The patch below adds arm*-*-eabi to this list.
Tested with cross to arm-none-eabi.
Applied to as obvious to mainline and csl-arm-branch.
Paul
2004-09-18 Paul Brook <paul@codesourcery.com>
* g++.old-deja/g++.pt/static11.C: XFAIL on arm*-*-eabi.
Index: g++.old-deja/g++.pt/static11.C
===================================================================
RCS file: /var/cvsroot/gcc-cvs/gcc/gcc/testsuite/g++.old-deja/g++.pt/static11.C,v
retrieving revision 1.4.10.1
diff -u -p -r1.4.10.1 static11.C
--- g++.old-deja/g++.pt/static11.C 30 Dec 2003 00:40:02 -0000 1.4.10.1
+++ g++.old-deja/g++.pt/static11.C 18 Sep 2004 22:49:56 -0000
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
// in their dejagnu baseboard description) require that the status is
// final when exit is entered (or main returns), and not "overruled" by a
// destructor calling _exit. It's not really worth it to handle that.
-// { dg-do run { xfail mmix-knuth-mmixware xtensa-*-elf* arm*-*-elf } }
+// { dg-do run { xfail mmix-knuth-mmixware xtensa-*-elf* arm*-*-elf arm*-*-eabi } }
// Bug: g++ was failing to destroy C<int>::a because it was using two
// different sentry variables for construction and destruction.