This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: PATCH: Add two ObjC++ callback functions to cp/decl.c
Ziemowit Laski <zlaski@apple.com> writes:
| On 12 Sep 2004, at 16.24, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
|
| > Ziemowit Laski <zlaski@apple.com> writes:
| >
| > | On 12 Sep 2004, at 15.58, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
| > |
| > | >
| > | > Of course, what you described above is not what "essentially"
| > happened.
| > | > I asked for what you're acttually trying to achieve for the hope of
| > | > getting moe understanding and looking for alternative. Neither the
| > | > asnwer you gave was very helfpul nor did you give an explanation of
| > | > how the whole things is being connected. I let it go.
| > |
| > | Here's the answer I gave you:
| > |
| > | http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2004-09/msg00852.html
| > |
| > | I'm sorry if it wasn't helpful but you never indicated as much.
| >
| > I read that mail, but since it not did explain how the things are
| > connected,
| >
| > I need to call do_poplevel() from a function called
| > objcp_end_compound_stmt(); I cannot use C++'s
| > finish_compound_stmt() because it does too much.
|
| Right; finish_compound_stmt() is public, but does other things besides
| do_poplevel(). But as a C++ maintainer, you already know that. So I
| still
| don't get what you're asking me.
I know the C++ bits; but you still refuse to explain why
objcp_end_compound_stmt() cannot be accomodated to call
finish_compound_stmt(). Just telling me that finish_compound_stmt()
does too much is unhelfpul.
[...]
| > If all goes well, I'll have the ObjC++ bits in the mainline in a
| > day or two; at that point, [...]
|
| ...At that point, the objcp/ bits will be in as well and then you can
| hopefully see how things are "connected" (whatever that means).
thus, "I won't explain before I put it there, and don't say anything".
-- Gaby