This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: Kill pointers keeping gimple function body around after RTL is generated


> While I would encourage identifying and fixing any leaks of SSA_NAMEs
> which are easily resolved.  You might even reach a point where we
> do not leak SSA_NAMEs, which would be good.  However, I don't think
> we should be looking at deallocating statement memory on the fly.

I was bit looking into this but hit an interesting problem.  I extended
release_ssa_name to kill pointers within the SSA_NAME structure so we
don't keep pointing to them and this broke repeated SSA renaming.  The
code first releases the phi nodes via remove_all_phi_nodes_for and later
travels the virtual operands that still possibly reffer to the old
SSA_NAMEs.  Is this an expected behavioiur?
It looks like quite dubious practice at least.

Honza


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]