Re: [PATCH] PR14841 and PR15838

[Andrew Pinski <pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu>]

On Aug 31, 2004, at 9:43 AM, Richard Kenner wrote:

> If this is just the case where B is a CONSTRUCTOR, I don't understand
> the issue you are raising.

If you read the PRs you would understand what was going on:

static const int a[1]={1};

int f(){return a[0];}


And

static const struct {int a} b = {1};

int f1() { return a.b;}


Thanks,
Andrew Pinski