This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: RFC: PATCH for thread-safe C++ static local initialization


On Mon, 23 Aug 2004 12:19:17 -0500, Benjamin Kosnik <bkoz@redhat.com> wrote:

>>> Maybe we should *always* do the full code sequence.
>>
>>I think we should do it unless explicitly disabled, a la
>>-fno-rtti/-fno-exceptions.
>
> Presumably, those embedded systems (or other configurations) that don't
> want this default sequence will configure with --disable-threads, which
> will default to gthr-single.h, which doesn't define __GTHREADS, which
> means none of this stuff will get pulled in for them anyway.
>
> So, there is a way to disable this, as-is.

No, that doesn't disable the code bloat around the actual site of the
static variable.

Jason


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]