This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: PATCH [mainline] power-ppc-darwin fix for a vector_size (8) return value

From: David Edelsohn <dje at watson dot ibm dot com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <bonzini at gnu dot org>
Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2004 09:44:24 -0400
Subject: Re: PATCH [mainline] power-ppc-darwin fix for a vector_size (8) return value
References: <59092818-EFE6-11D8-888A-000A95BA54A6@apple.com> <200408170204.i7H24dD29270@makai.watson.ibm.com> <41259CFE.2030106@gnu.org>

>>>>> Paolo Bonzini writes:

Paolo> Pinging the rs6000 part of 
Paolo> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2004-07/msg02197.html

Paolo> 2004-07-22  Paolo Bonzini  <bonzini@gnu.org>

Paolo> * config/rs6000/rs6000.c (USE_ALTIVEC_FOR_ARG_P,
Paolo> init_cumulative_args, function_arg_boundary,
Paolo> function_arg_advance, function_arg,
Paolo> rs6000_pass_by_reference, rs6000_gimplify_va_arg):
Paolo> Look into the type instead of using
Paolo> ALTIVEC_VECTOR_MODE.

	I currently am leaning against approving this patch.  I do not
think it is the correct solution.

David

Follow-Ups:
- Re: PATCH [mainline] power-ppc-darwin fix for a vector_size (8) returnvalue
  - From: Paolo Bonzini

References:
- PATCH [mainline] power-ppc-darwin fix for a vector_size (8) return value
  - From: Fariborz Jahanian
- Re: PATCH [mainline] power-ppc-darwin fix for a vector_size (8) return value
  - From: David Edelsohn
- Re: PATCH [mainline] power-ppc-darwin fix for a vector_size (8) returnvalue
  - From: Paolo Bonzini

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]