This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] Omit frame pointer and fix %ebp by default on x86 (take 3)

From: Geoffrey Keating <geoffk at geoffk dot org>
To: Roger Sayle <roger at eyesopen dot com>
Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: 17 Aug 2004 13:31:01 -0700
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Omit frame pointer and fix %ebp by default on x86 (take 3)
References: <20040816182049.GB23283@redhat.com> <Pine.LNX.4.44.0408161156500.22769-100000@www.eyesopen.com>

So, as a comment, wouldn't it be easier to simply declare that
'backtrace requires unwind information'?  That would give faster code
if backtrace was not used.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] Omit frame pointer and fix %ebp by default on x86 (take 3)
  - From: Andrew Haley

References:
- Re: [PATCH] Omit frame pointer and fix %ebp by default on x86 (take 3)
  - From: Richard Henderson
- Re: [PATCH] Omit frame pointer and fix %ebp by default on x86 (take3)
  - From: Roger Sayle

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]