This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: patch candidate for PR target/16665

From: Kaz Kojima <kkojima at rr dot iij4u dot or dot jp>
To: joern dot rennecke at superh dot com
Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Fri, 06 Aug 2004 17:25:55 +0900 (JST)
Subject: Re: patch candidate for PR target/16665
References: <200408031243.i73Ch4U08271@chloe.uk.w2k.superh.com><200408031605.i73G5HI09202@chloe.uk.w2k.superh.com>

Joern Rennecke <joern.rennecke@superh.com> wrote:
> Here is the SH specific patch to go with the cp/method.c patch.
> So far I have only checked that the assembly looks right.
> (for sh5-compact and sh5 at -O0 and -O2, with and without -fpic).
> 
> 2004-08-03  J"orn Rennecke <joern.rennecke@superh.com>
> 
> 	* sh.md (UNSPEC_THUNK): New constant.
> 	(gen_sibcalli_thunk): New pattern.
> 	* sh.c (sh_output_mi_thunk): Use limited range pc-relative addressing.

FYI, this together with your patch against cp/method.c makes
full bootstrap on i686-pc-linux-gnu and sh4-unknown-linux-gnu.
There are no new failures in a top-level "make -k check" on both
targets.

Regards,
	kaz

References:
- Re: Quo vadis, thunk? (Was: Re: [PATCH/RFA] PR target/16665: SH thunk
  - From: Joern Rennecke
- patch candidate for PR target/16665 (Was: Re: Quo vadis, thunk?)
  - From: Joern Rennecke

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]