This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Remove some more unused code from ia64 back end.

From: Zack Weinberg <zack at codesourcery dot com>
To: James E Wilson <wilson at specifixinc dot com>
Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 17:54:23 -0700
Subject: Re: Remove some more unused code from ia64 back end.
References: <87u0vqpsy8.fsf@codesourcery.com><1091133486.19952.27.camel@aretha.corp.specifixinc.com><87ekmupjfm.fsf@codesourcery.com><1091148610.19952.92.camel@aretha.corp.specifixinc.com>

James E Wilson <wilson@specifixinc.com> writes:

> In any case, I don't think that is really necessary.  The code is
> supposed to be there.  We want it to be there.  The only thing wrong is
> the spurious 'return 1;' that needs to be removed.  I would be satisfied
> with just putting the code back without the return 1 and the
> currently_expanding_to_rtl hack.

... which is what the patch appended to the message you're responding
to did.  Are you happy with that patch?

zw

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Remove some more unused code from ia64 back end.
  - From: James E Wilson

References:
- Remove some more unused code from ia64 back end.
  - From: Zack Weinberg
- Re: Remove some more unused code from ia64 back end.
  - From: James E Wilson
- Re: Remove some more unused code from ia64 back end.
  - From: Zack Weinberg
- Re: Remove some more unused code from ia64 back end.
  - From: James E Wilson

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]