This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Patch to docs of Cimplementation-defined behavior
On Thu, 29 Jul 2004, Paolo Carlini wrote:
> and sorry in advance if my observation is obviously wrong: my english
> is not so good, sadly...
>
> > the number of significant characters are defined by the linker; for
>
> Shouldn't this be: "... characters _is_ defined ..." ??
That's pre-existing text. I doubt the grammar of the references to
library properties as well. Fixes to these would come under the obvious
rule. (And if anyone finds something factually wrong in any of the
statements, pre-existing or new, or some aspect of implementation-defined
behavior not covered - the lists in Annexes to the C standards may not be
exhaustive - that can also be fixed as separate patches, but now the text
does attempt to cover everything.)
--
Joseph S. Myers http://www.srcf.ucam.org/~jsm28/gcc/
jsm@polyomino.org.uk (personal mail)
jsm28@gcc.gnu.org (Bugzilla assignments and CCs)