This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: patch ping for altivec.h and vmx tests
- From: Aldy Hernandez <aldyh at redhat dot com>
- To: Janis Johnson <janis187 at us dot ibm dot com>
- Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2004 18:21:07 -0400
- Subject: Re: patch ping for altivec.h and vmx tests
- References: <20040722202616.GA5883@us.ibm.com>
On Thu, Jul 22, 2004 at 01:26:16PM -0700, Janis Johnson wrote:
> Ping for several altivec patches.
>
> changes to altivec.h:
Zem, could you be more careful next time? Most of these correct problems
with the compile time error code, and the bool code. At least I think
it was you.
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2004-07/msg00175.html
Ok.
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2004-07/msg00176.html
Ok.
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2004-07/msg00177.html
Ok.
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2004-07/msg00178.html
Ok.
>
> fixes to gcc.dg/vmx tests:
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2004-07/msg00085.html
Ok.
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2004-07/msg00086.html
Ok.
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2004-07/msg00087.html
Your target for the test is powerpc*-*-darwin*, but you tested on
Linux. Could you test this on darwin?
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2004-07/msg00088.html
Argh... We could just remove these tests. I really don't care for them.
Either your patch, or removing them altogether is OK.
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2004-07/msg00089.html
Ok.
Thanks so much for these fixes Janis.
Aldy