This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: PATCH [cygwin/mingw ]: Don't add stdcall suffix to variadicfunctions
- From: Jason Merrill <jason at redhat dot com>
- To: Danny Smith <danny_smith_0000 at yahoo dot co dot nz>
- Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, me at cgf dot cx
- Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2004 12:25:32 -0400
- Subject: Re: PATCH [cygwin/mingw ]: Don't add stdcall suffix to variadicfunctions
- References: <20040715065333.32643.qmail@web50907.mail.yahoo.com>
On Thu, 15 Jul 2004 18:53:33 +1200 (NZST), Danny Smith <danny_smith_0000@yahoo.co.nz> wrote:
> However, for variadic functions, which cannot be handled
> as __stdcall because the parameter list is indefinite, it
> leaves off the suffix
> eg.
> void __stdcall foo (int a, ...)
>
> foo stays as _foo
>
> Currently gcc adds @0 suffix to both types of function
>
> The following patch makes gcc consistent with native compiler. It also
> rationalizes the two functions gen_fastcall_sufffix and gen_stdcall_suffix
> (which are identical except for two statements) into a single function
Would it make more sense just to ignore the __stdcall for variadic
functions, since it doesn't work anyway?
Jason