Re: fix builtins/fputs.c

[Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>]

On Fri, Jul 09, 2004 at 09:37:28PM -0600, Roger Sayle wrote:
> I've been wondering whether this should be split out into an even
> more aggressive function, something like "ignore_tree_value (tree)"?

Eh.  I don't expect that it would actually be worthwhile.
How often do you expect to find deeply nested ignored
expressions?  Pretty infrequently I'd think.

Of more interest here would be not creating the one cast
that we do build in the first place, since we *know* that
the value is ignored.


r~