This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Several regressions in libstdc++ after your changes totree-inline.c
- From: Diego Novillo <dnovillo at redhat dot com>
- To: Richard Kenner <kenner at vlsi1 dot ultra dot nyu dot edu>
- Cc: "gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Thu, 08 Jul 2004 10:59:57 -0400
- Subject: Re: Several regressions in libstdc++ after your changes totree-inline.c
- Organization: Red Hat Canada
- References: <10407081456.AA13682@vlsi1.ultra.nyu.edu>
On Thu, 2004-07-08 at 10:56, Richard Kenner wrote:
> I find it very hard to believe that you even bothered running the
> testsuite.
>
> I did, but my target has some pre-existing errors that can sometimes
> make it tricky to see exactly what's going on, especially with C++.
>
Which proves my point. You didn't bother running the testsuite with a
clean tree and a patched tree.
This would probably be easier if we were running with a 0 regression
policy. But we are not. So, please be more careful and compare with a
clean tree before committing your patches.
Thanks. Diego.