This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: fix g++.dg/init/new4.C


    I *think* this flag should go away, and the error generated by
    variable_size should be generated by the front ends.  I havn't
    looked at this in detail yet.

I'm not sure that the entire concept of pending sizes makes sense anymore 
at all.  For one thing, there's the issue of keeping the context straight
in the presence of nested functions.

As long as each variable-length type and decl is in a DECL_EXPR, the
gimplifier should take care of making sure everything is evaluated at
the right place.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]